Atmospheralab.com
  • EcoMagazine
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Italiano
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
You are here: Home1 / Coca-cola: a marketing and pollution giant2 / Food and cooking3 / Coca-cola: a marketing and pollution giant

    Coca-cola: un colosso del marketing e dell’inquinamento

    How the most famous soft drink brand is ruining the planet

    25/07/2024

    A global marketing phenomenon

    Coca-Cola is one of the largest multinational corporations globally and certainly one of the most popular carbonated soft drink brands. Thanks in part to the marketing strategies adopted over the years, the company has become increasingly relevant in the soft drink market, becoming its main competitor. 

    But with great power comes great responsibility, and as time has progressed, the Coca-Cola company group has had to deal with the issue of sustainability several times. This is due to the fact that numerous issues have accumulated behind this great behemoth that have challenged the ethics of the brand. It therefore turns out to be necessary to briefly review Coca-Cola’s rise to success in order to analyse its critical points.

    The history of Coca-Cola began in May 1886 in Atlanta, Georgia, when pharmacist John Pemberton decided to combine a new recipe for a syrup with the sparkling consistency of carbonated water, producing a drink that later became the well-known Coca-Cola. But it was not until two years later, in 1888, that its rise in the global market began, when entrepreneur Asa Candler bought the secret recipe and began marketing it first in Atlanta and then throughout the United States.

    Coca-Cola and water consumption

    Candler’s advertising campaign was a real success that led Coca-Cola to expand beyond national borders. From this expansion of the brand came a series of corporate policies of dubious ethicality. In fact, one of the secrets of its success was keeping production costs low by drawing water from local sources, yet causing environmental problems of no small magnitude.  

    Since the drink mostly consists of water, the entire production requires large quantities of it. In this way, Coca-Cola turns out to be not only a carbonated soft drink company, but in effect also a distributor of substantial water resources. Therefore, the continuous drainage of local water supplies has an increasing substantial impact on the environment and local farmers. 

    According to a third-party assessment, in 2010, to produce even one half-liter bottle, the company used 150 to 300 litres of water. Of the water used, 99.8 percent was used to prepare ingredients such as cane sugar, a food that requires a huge amount of water for its production.

    Water consumption is also particularly significant in the bottling process. In fact, in 2004, Coca-Cola had to shut down a bottling plant in Kerala, India, because it was sucking up too much groundwater. Following this event, similar incidents have occurred elsewhere. For example, in 2014 Indian farmers in Varanasi protested against a Coca-Cola plant because of excessive consumption of local water resources diverted from their agricultural activities. These protests led to the permanent closure of the plant.

    Solutions to the problem: are they really effective?

    In 2018, in the face of this reputation, Coca-Cola announced that it was changing course, saying it intended to reintegrate 100% of the water used to create its beverages back into local water systems. But according to an investigative report published by The Verge, this would be pure greenwashing since, despite the premise, Coca-Cola is still proceeding with a business-as-usual strategy. 

    Moreover, in certain situations, the sustainability projects promoted by Coca-Cola have made things worse than they were at the beginning. For example, the digging of irrigation canals funded in Mexican National Parks in order to improve growing conditions for some tree species has done more harm than good.

    The Mexican government’s forestry commission, endorsed by sound scientific studies, has pointed out that this practice has not actually improved conditions for vegetative growth, on the contrary increasing soil erosion and forest degradation.

    Problems with packaging: the high consumption of plastic

    In addition to the indiscriminate use of water, another problem caused by Coca-Cola is the intensive use of plastic for bottling. Every day this company sells about 1.9 billion drinks and almost all of them are bottled in plastic. Despite the statement by Enrico De Giuli, Country Operational Sustainability manager of Coca-Cola HBC Italy, that the company’s products are recyclable, some concerns have been raised over time.

    In fact, if in the 1950s Coca-Cola bottles were packaged in glass and had a void deposit to the value of 40 cents so that the packaging could be reobtained and reused, with the entry of disposable plastic Coca-Cola drastically changed its bottling packaging in order to reduce production costs.

    Recently, the Atlanta-based company admitted to be producing more than 3 million tons of plastic each year, the equivalent of 200,000 plastic bottles every minute. Although Coca-Cola bottles are made of PET plastic, HDPE caps and PVC labels – all easily recyclable materials – most are not actually recycled. Here, however, it is necessary to point out that this does not directly result from internal company policies, but rather occurs because of unethical behaviour by individual consumers. Therefore, it could be hypothesised that one of the determinants of a brand’s level of sustainability is definitely the attitude of its customers toward the environment.

    To underscore this collective image, an audit estimated that in 2018 and 2019 Coca-Cola was found to be the brand with the most waste in the ocean, followed by Nestlé and Pepsi. In essence, since the 1970s, with the adoption of plastic packaging, Coca-Cola has increased its impact on the environment, local communities, and in the oceans.

    To remedy these problems, Coca-Cola has launched a series of campaigns to combat waste pollution, such as “A World Without Waste?” in 2020, based on the idea of making the life cycle of Coca-Cola packaging more circular and sustainable, hoping-among other goals-that for every bottle purchased, every consumer will reuse or recycle another one.

    However, while these kinds of initiatives may seem like steps toward greater awareness of one’s impact on the environment, they also risk becoming mere attempts to impute one’s faults to someone else, only emphasising how it is individual citizens who are the polluters, for example, by not sorting their waste.

    Future Visions

    These are just some of the problems Coca-Cola has had over the years regarding its approach to sustainability. Despite the campaigns launched with the aim of raising awareness among their buyers and their strategies to reduce their environmental impact, they have not always been successful.

    It would therefore be worthwhile to think about substantial changes in company policies, so that there can be real breakthroughs and a more sustainable production model is implemented within this soft drinks market giant.

    • Share on Facebook
    • Share on X
    • Share on WhatsApp
    • Share on LinkedIn
    • Link to Instagram
    • Link to Youtube
    Matteo Porazzi

    Graduated in Environmental Humanities from Ca’ Foscari University in Venice. He is passionate about sustainability, food, geography and animal studies, mainly in relation to contemporary issues. He found Atmosphera Lab a perfect place to express himself.

    More articles

    Active(ist) Participation
    • Society

    Active(ist) Participation

    14/02/2025
    The Greenhouse Gas Challenge
    • Society

    The Greenhouse Gas Challenge

    14/02/2025
    Plastic on the beach: waste or find?
    • Society

    Plastic on the beach: waste or find?

    14/02/2025
    A lagoon-colored soccer jersey: the partnership between Ocean Space and Venezia FC
    • Art

    A lagoon-colored soccer jersey: the partnership between Ocean Space and Venezia FC

    14/02/2025
    The danger of eco-fascism
    • Society

    The danger of eco-fascism

    23/09/2024
    Grycle, a technology for a world without waste
    • Science and environment

    Grycle, a technology for a world without waste

    18/09/2024

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Atmosphera lab
    • Contacts
    • EcoMagazine

    Categories

    • Agriculture
    • Animals
    • Architecture and design
    • Art
    • Daily activities
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Fashion
    • Food and cooking
    • Mobility and Tourism
    • No category
    • Science and environment
    • Society

    Archive

    • February 2025
    • September 2024
    • July 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • February 2024
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020

    INFO

    • About Us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap

    RECENT POSTS

    • Active(ist) Participation
    • The Greenhouse Gas Challenge
    • Plastic on the beach: waste or find?

    CONTACTS

    atmospheralab@gmail.com

    © Copyright 2020 - Atmosphera lab - Developed by Matteo Bazzani
    • Link to Instagram
    • Link to Facebook
    • Link to X
    • Link to LinkedIn
    • Link to Youtube
    • About Us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
    Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top